Bug 8128 - [Anolis23.1][RC2][内核兼容性][ANCK-5.10-016.2][x86_64]ANCK-5.10-016.2_rc2内核兼容性评估kparams部分项结果有差异
Summary: [Anolis23.1][RC2][内核兼容性][ANCK-5.10-016.2][x86_64]ANCK-5.10-016.2_rc2内核兼容性评估kp...
Status: CLOSED BYDESIGN
Alias: None
Product: ANCK 5.10 Dev
Classification: ANCK
Component: general/others (show other bugs) general/others
Version: 5.10.y-16.2
Hardware: All Linux
: P3-Medium S3-normal
Target Milestone: rc
Assignee: maqiao
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2024-02-01 11:33 UTC by Banana
Modified: 2024-03-29 10:26 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments
x86_kparams部分差异评估结果 (1.72 KB, text/csv)
2024-02-01 11:34 UTC, Banana
Details
arm-kparams评估异常项 (1.39 KB, text/csv)
2024-02-01 15:17 UTC, Banana
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Banana alibaba_cloud_group 2024-02-01 11:33:42 UTC
[问题描述]:
An23.1 ANCK-5.10-016.2_rc2内核兼容性评估kparams部分项结果有差异
结果说明:
result为diff:评估差异

[环境信息]:
数据采集评估机器类型:ECS

[内核信息]:
- 基准内核:
[root@iZbp135ihsd67yb2jtkdy9Z ~]# uname -r
5.10.134-16.1.an23.x86_64

- 评估内核:
[root@localhost database]# uname -r
5.10.134-16.2_rc2.an23.x86_64

[操作系统信息]:
- 基准系统:
[root@iZbp135ihsd67yb2jtkdy9Z ~]# cat /etc/os-release
NAME="Anolis OS"
VERSION="23"
ID="anolis"
VERSION_ID="23"
PLATFORM_ID="platform:an23"
PRETTY_NAME="Anolis OS 23"
ANSI_COLOR="0;31"
HOME_URL="https://openanolis.cn/"
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/"

- 评估系统:
[root@localhost database]# cat /etc/os-release
NAME="Anolis OS"
VERSION="23"
ID="anolis"
VERSION_ID="23"
PLATFORM_ID="platform:an23"
PRETTY_NAME="Anolis OS 23"
ANSI_COLOR="0;31"
HOME_URL="https://openanolis.cn/"
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/"

[期望结果]:
需判定评估结果:
1、如果是内核新特性则结果正常
2、如果是内核bug,则需解决,评估结果应正常

[实际结果]:
见附件异常项
Comment 1 Banana alibaba_cloud_group 2024-02-01 11:34:28 UTC
Created attachment 1004 [details]
x86_kparams部分差异评估结果
Comment 2 yunmeng365524 2024-02-01 11:45:47 UTC
我看016.2 跟016.1 对比,在网络的kparams有不少差异项,请帮忙分析一下是否是正常变更。
Comment 3 maqiao alibaba_cloud_group 2024-02-01 14:57:05 UTC
分析结果:

只是个统计数据,建议加白,每次都会diff出来不一样
/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/full_scans
/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/pages_collapsed


和机器的cpu数量有关系:
/proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_cpumask


和机器的动态内存有关系,建议加白:
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_orphans
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_syn_backlog
/proc/sys/user/max_cgroup_namespaces
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_mem
/proc/sys/kernel/threads-max
/proc/sys/user/max_ipc_namespaces
/proc/sys/user/max_user_namespaces
/proc/sys/user/max_time_namespaces
/proc/sys/fs/epoll/max_user_watches
/proc/sys/user/max_pid_namespaces
/proc/sys/user/max_net_namespaces
/sys/kernel/vmcoreinfo
/proc/sys/user/max_uts_namespaces
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/udp_mem
/proc/sys/user/max_mnt_namespaces

怀疑是tuned做了改动:
/proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio

随机数据,加白:
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_fastopen_key
/proc/sys/kernel/random/boot_id

没有发现差别:
/proc/sys/net/core/flow_limit_cpu_bitmap
Comment 4 Banana alibaba_cloud_group 2024-02-01 15:17:13 UTC
Created attachment 1015 [details]
arm-kparams评估异常项

麻烦帮忙分析arm环境结果,如果是与上面评论重复的项,且结论相同,可以忽略,无需针对这项回复。
Comment 5 maqiao alibaba_cloud_group 2024-02-02 14:04:04 UTC
(In reply to Banana from comment #4)
> Created attachment 1015 [details]
> arm-kparams评估异常项
> 
> 麻烦帮忙分析arm环境结果,如果是与上面评论重复的项,且结论相同,可以忽略,无需针对这项回复。

arm分析结果参考x86,都是一样的。
Comment 6 maqiao alibaba_cloud_group 2024-02-02 14:04:46 UTC
置为bydesign